Hurt v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
POWELL, Judge.
This case is here for the purpose of reviewing the action of the district court of Oklahoma County, which after hearing, refused to grant a writ of error coran* nobis,1 which is to say, to grant the peti1-tioner a new trial for alleged errors of fact, said to have been unknown at the time of trial of State v. Hurt in the district court of Okahoma County on February 11-, 1-95⅜. and which, if known, would have brought about a different result. A number of grounds were set our in the petition, which' was filed on February 6, 1957 in this court, attached to an application for leave…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Mooney v. HolohanSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- People v. SavvidesNew York Court of Appeals · 1956
- In Re LindleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- People v. MleczkoNew York Court of Appeals · 1948
- Anderson v. BuchananCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1943
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Shapard v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1967
- Roberts v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1977
- Perry v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1988
- In Re Winineger's PetitionCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1959
- Newell v. PageDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 1968
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.