Legal Opinion
Franklin v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided February 2, 1955No. A-12072PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
POWELL, Judge.
The plaintiff in error, Jack Franklin, hereinafter referred to as defendant, was tried and convicted in the court of .common pleas of Tulsa County where he was charged with unlawful possession of intoxicating liquor, and was sentenced to serve thirty days in the county jail, and pay a fine of $50.
A jury was waived and the case was tried to the court. It was stipulated between the county attorney and defendant’s counsel that the evidence adduced on the motion to suppress, and the trial of the case on its merits should be considered as one and the same hearing. Two propositions…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Mitchell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1941
- McCarthy v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1950
- Wirth v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1944
- Arnold v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1940
- Hutson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1941
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Booze v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1964
- Ellis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1970
- Fields v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1969
- Williams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1955
- Forrester v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1956
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.