Platner v. Vincent
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Tehama County. John F. Ellison, Judge. Reversed. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtShurtleff, J.
The amended complaint in this action contains two counts. The first alleges that on June 5, 1916, plaintiff was the owner, entitled to, and in possession of a designated lodging-house in San Francisco, under and by virtue of a certain lease, and on the same day was also the owner of, entitled to, and in possession of the furniture therein. That on said day one C. H. Vincent and the defendant Lillian Vincent made their bargain and sale deed, which is set forth in haec verba, conveying certain real property situate in the state of Washington to plaintiff, the operative words of which deed are,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Hayes v. O'BrienIllinois Supreme Court · 1894
- McGoon v. ScalesSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
- Thomson v. KyleSupreme Court of Florida · 1897
- McGary v. HastingsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1870
- McCormick v. MarcyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Mercantile Acceptance Co. v. FrankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
- Platner v. VincentCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
- Los Angeles & Salt Lake R. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1944
- Sullivan v. ShannonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
- Brewster v. HinesWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1971
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.