McCormick v. Marcy
California Supreme Court
APP13AL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles \ County and from an order refusing a new trial. Curtis D*. Wilbur, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
The action is to recover damages arising from a breach of covenants in a conveyance of land. Judgment below was given for the plaintiff, defendant’s motion for a new trial was denied and she has appealed from the judgment and order.
On March 8, 1899, the defendant executed a deed purporting to convey to plaintiff a section of land in Kansas for the price of three thousand five hundred dollars. The covenant in the deed, which it is herein claimed was broken, is in the following clause thereof: “And the said Annora Marcy does hereby covenant and agree that at the delivery hereof Annora Marcy is…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Touchard v. CrowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1862
- McGary v. HastingsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1870
- Spotts v. HanleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Levitzky v. CanningCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
- Mahoney v. Van WinkleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1863
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Standard Livestock Co. v. PentzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
- Holzworth v. RothSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1960
- Stockton Theatres, Inc. v. PalermoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Hornaday v. HornadayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
- Carty v. BlauthCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.