Legal Opinion

Estate v. Wikman

California Supreme Court

Decided February 5, 1906No. Sac. No. 1414PublishedCited by 16 opinions

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Butte County denying the petition of appellant for appointment as executrix and from an order denying a new trial. John C. Gray, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtMcFARLAND, J.

This above-named Charles A. Wikman, deceased, was in his lifetime a resident of Butte County, California, and died there on or about the first day of November, 1904, leaving a will which had been duly executed on the twentieth day of May, 1904. On November 29, 1904, Solomon Pettit, who was public administrator of Butte County, filed a petition for the probate of the will and for letters testamentary with the will annexed; and a few days later Mary Heeney filed a petition praying that letters testamentary in the estate be granted to her. The petition of the public administrator is based on the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Olmsted v. BussCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Finkler v. PurcellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Koeberle v. HotchkissCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
  3. Estate of DumasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Estate of MartensCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  5. In Re Dougan's EstateOregon Supreme Court · 1935

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API