Legal Opinion
Alaska Mexican Gold Mining Co. v. Territory of Alaska
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 5, 1916No. 2727PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHunt, Circuit Judge
(after stating the facts as above).
By the Act of May 1, 1913, which was to establish a system of taxation, create revenue, and provide for collection thereof, and for other purposes (Alaska Salmon Company v. Territory of Alaska, No. 2720, 236 F. 62, 149 C.C.A. 272), the Legislature provided that any person prosecuting any of the following lines of business within Alaska should first apply for and obtain license so to do from the District Court or subdivision thereof in said territory, and “pay for said license for the respective lines of business and trades as follows, to wit: * * * Mining.…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Johnson v. Southern Pacific Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1904
- United States v. StowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Stephens v. Cherokee NationSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- Sturges v. CarterSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Cliquot's ChampagneSupreme Court of the United States · 1866
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Ex Parte Keane v. StrodtmanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1929
- United States v. AyerCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1926
- United States v. Nashville, C. & St. L. RyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1918
- Northern Commercial Co. v. Territory of AlaskaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1923
- Alaska Pacific Fisheries v. Territory of AlaskaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1916
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.