Legal Opinion

Alaska Pacific Fisheries v. Territory of Alaska

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 5, 1916No. 2731PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHunt, Circuit Judge

(after stating the facts as above).

The questions presented are: (1) Does the act of the territorial Legislature of 1913 (Laws 1913, c. 52), which establishes a system of taxation, creates revenue, and provides for collection thereof, for the territory of Alaska, and for other purposes, create any civil liability? (2) Does this act just referred to, taken in connection with the subsequent act of the Legislature of Alaska passed in 1915 (Laws 1915, c. 76), provide for any civil remedy? (3) Is the act of the territorial Legislature of 1913 valid? (4) Can plaintiff in error be held liable in view…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Church of the Holy Trinity v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Henderson v. Mayor of the City of New York Commissioners of Immigration v. North German LloydSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  3. Lau Ow Bew v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  4. Oates v. National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  5. Alaska Pacific Fisheries v. Territory of AlaskaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1916

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Utah Power & Light Co. v. PfostDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 1931
  2. City of St. Paul v. Twin City Motor Bus Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
  3. Anderson v. SmithDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1934
  4. Pioneer Packing Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1938
  5. Pioneer Packing Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1938

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API