Northern Commercial Co. v. Territory of Alaska
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the CourtGilbert, Circuit Judge
(after stating the facts as above).
The plaintiff in error contends that in levying the tax prescribed in- section 3, the Legislature imposed a tax upon each article of property handled by the fur dealer under his license, and that-it is therefore an ad valorem *168tax on property, and void for the reason that it is not levied in accordance with the provisions of the Organic Act, section 9 of which provides that — “All taxes shall be uniform upon the same class of subjects and shall be levied and collected under general laws and the assessment shall be according to the actual value thereof. No tax…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Society for Savings v. CoiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1868
- Choctaw, Oklahoma & Gulf Railroad v. HarrisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Alaska Fish Salting & By-Products Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Ohio Tax CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Thompson v. McLeodMississippi Supreme Court · 1916
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Haavik v. Alaska Packers Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Robison v. DwyerWashington Supreme Court · 1961
- Flynn, Welch & Yates, Inc. v. State Tax CommissionNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1934
- Pauley v. CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1934
- Anderson v. SmithDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1934
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.