Ex Parte Keane v. Strodtman
Supreme Court of Missouri
1Opinion of the CourtWalker, J.
This is a proceeding in Habeas Corpus to test the validity of an ordinance of the city of St. Louis, No. 35536, approved January 10, 1927, requiring persons engaged in the business of erecting, maintaining or repairing awnings which project over public highways, to procure from the city of St. Louis a license therefor and to pay for that privilege the sum of $100 per year.
The petitioner refused to comply with this ordinance and was arraigned, tried and convicted in the Court of Criminal Correction and fined $100. Tn default of payment of the same he was taken into custody by the sheriff, and…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Lindsley v. Natural Carbonic Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- St. Louis Consolidated Coal Co. v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Ex Parte Siemens v. ShreeveSupreme Court of Missouri · 1927
- City of St. Louis v. BaskowitzSupreme Court of Missouri · 1918
- Ex parte SmithSupreme Court of Missouri · 1910
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Kansas City v. J. I. Case Threshing MacHine Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1935
- Shinn v. Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
- Taylor v. DimmittSupreme Court of Missouri · 1935
- Utah Rapid Transit Co. v. Ogden CityUtah Supreme Court · 1936
- State v. GreenSupreme Court of Missouri · 1974
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.