Legal Opinion

Ringling v. Ringling Bros.—Barnum & Bailey Combined Shows, Inc.

Court of Chancery of Delaware

Decided November 4, 1946PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Seitz, Vice-Chancellor:

Petitioner in this proceeding contests the validity of the election of directors and officers of the defendant corporation which took place at its annual stockholders’ and directors’ meetings held this year.

At all times here involved, the 1000 shares of authorized and issued common stock of the defendant corporation, Ringling Bros.-Barnum & Bailey Combined Shows, Inc. (hereafter called the “defendant corporation” or the “corporation”), were owned or controlled as follows:

Edith Conway Ringling—petitioner—315 shares

Aubrey B. Haley—a defendant—315 shares

John Ringling…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Clark v. DodgeNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
  2. Peyton v. William C. Peyton Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1939
  3. Smith v. San Francisco & North Pacific Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Ringling Bros.-Barnum & Bailey Combined Shows Inc. v. RinglingCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1947
  5. Alderman v. AldermanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1935

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. McDermott Inc. v. LewisSupreme Court of Delaware · 1987
  2. Guilford Glazer v. Jerome S. Glazer and Louis A. Glazer, Jerome S. Glazer and Louis A. Glazer v. Guilford GlazerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
  3. Signal Oil & Gas Co. v. Ashland Oil & Refining Co.California Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Haft v. Dart Group Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1993
  5. Tankersley v. AlbrightDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1974

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API