Legal Opinion
Haft v. Dart Group Corp.
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided December 30, 1993No. Civ. A. 93-384PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MURRAY M. SCHWARTZ, Senior District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
This case arises out of various disputes among members of the family which controls a parent holding company, Dart Group Corporation [“Dart”], and several majority owned subsidiaries, including Crown Books Corporation [“Crown”] and Trak Auto Corporation [“Trak”]. This Court has subject matter jurisdiction by virtue of diversity of citizenship. 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a)(1) (1988).
In his' amended complaint, Robert M. Haft [‘‘plaintiff’] has asserted nine claims against Dart, Crown, and Trak [“defendants”], and defendants have responded…
2Cases cited95 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Precision Instrument Manufacturing Co. v. Automotive Maintenance MacHinery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
90 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Yolton v. El Paso Tennessee Pipeline Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
- Zupnick v. GoizuetaCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1997
- Leonard v. University of DelawareDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2002
- Merisant Co. v. McNeil Nutritionals, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2007
- Cryovac Inc. v. Pechiney Plastic Packaging, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2006
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.