Legal Opinion
Cleveland Bar Ass'n v. Rossi
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided March 11, 1998No. 97-1309PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Per curiam
We adopt the findings of fact and the conclusions of the board. However, we believe that the facts of this case warrant the sanction of a public reprimand. Respondent is so reprimanded. Costs taxed to respondent.
Judgment accordingly.
Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur. Moyer, C.J., and Cook, J., dissent.
2Cited by4 opinions
- Toledo Bar Ass'n v. Mansour-IsmailOhio Supreme Court · 1999
- Cleveland Bar Assn. v. RossiOhio Supreme Court · 1998
- Disciplinary Counsel v. SartiniOhio Supreme Court · 2007
- Toledo Bar Assn. v. Mansour-IsmailOhio Supreme Court · 1999