Legal Opinion

People v. Smith-Anthony

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 30, 2013No. Docket 145371PublishedCited by 65 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtViviano, J.

In this case, we consider the meaning of the phrase “from the person of another” under MCL 750.357, the larceny-from-the-person statute. Until 2004, Michigan’s robbery statute contained this phrase as well, so we also consider whether the 2004 amendment that removed this phrase from the robbery statute1 altered the meaning of “from the person” in the larceny-from-the-person statute.

We hold that Michigan law requires a defendant to take property from the physical person or immediate presence of a victim to commit a larceny from the person. In rare cases, a taking outside of a victim’s…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. People v. ChamblisMichigan Supreme Court · 1975
  2. People v. CornellMichigan Supreme Court · 2002
  3. People v. PetrellaMichigan Supreme Court · 1986
  4. People v. StoneMichigan Supreme Court · 2001
  5. People v. BeachMichigan Supreme Court · 1988

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by65 opinions

  1. People v. MarchMichigan Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Duryane Chaney v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2019
  3. In re NapierajMichigan Court of Appeals · 2014
  4. People of Michigan v. Kathleen Louise WilliamsMichigan Court of Appeals · 2018
  5. Jordan v. BaumanDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2019

60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API