Legal Opinion

People v. Cornell

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 18, 2002No. Docket 115833PublishedCited by 232 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWeaver, J.

In the case before us, we must consider two issues: (1) whether the trial court erred in refus*337ing to give the requested misdemeanor lesser included offense instruction of breaking and entering without permission, MCL 750.115, and (2) if the trial court did err, whether the error was harmless. We hold that it was error for the trial court to refuse the requested instruction and that the error was harmless. Therefore, we affirm defendant’s conviction.

I

Defendant Cornell was convicted by a jury in the Roscommon Circuit Court of breaking and entering with the intent to commit larceny, MCL 750.110.…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  2. People v. CarinesMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Sansone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. Sparf v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  5. People v. BrevermanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by232 opinions

  1. People v. HeftMichigan Court of Appeals · 2012
  2. Devillers v. Auto Club Ins. Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 2005
  3. People v. MendozaMichigan Supreme Court · 2003
  4. People v. WilliamsMichigan Supreme Court · 2006
  5. People v. GillisMichigan Supreme Court · 2006

227 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API