Legal Opinion

In re Napieraj

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided April 15, 2014No. Docket No. 314305PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

Respondent, Arek Napieraj, appeals as of right an order of disposition following his adjudication of guilt on one count of school truancy, MCL 712A.2(a)(4). Finding insufficient evidence that respondent’s absences were “willful,” we reverse.

I. BASIC FACTS

Respondent had a history of frequent absences from school and in September 2011, school officials met with respondent’s mother and respondent to discuss the fact that respondent had already missed four days of school and the school year was just underway. Respondent’s mother explained “I told them that it was an ongoing problem . . . from…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. People v. MeissnerMichigan Court of Appeals · 2011
  2. Jennings v. SouthwoodMichigan Supreme Court · 1994
  3. People v. GillisMichigan Supreme Court · 2006
  4. People v. Smith-AnthonyMichigan Supreme Court · 2013
  5. People v. Lanzo Construction Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2007

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Millis Public Schools v. M.P.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2018
  2. People of Michigan v. Charles Damon JonesMichigan Court of Appeals · 2017
  3. People of Michigan v. Tyisha Monika ToliverMichigan Court of Appeals · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API