McGarvey v. Butler Consolidated Coal Co.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Reno, J.,
The question in this workmen’s compensation case is whether the record contains sufficient competent evidence to support the referee’s findings, affirmed by the board, that claimant is totally disabled solely as a result of silicosis contracted in defendant’s bituminous Coal mine, and whether the findings sustain .the conclusions of law and the award to claimant under the Pennsylvania Occupational Disease Act of June 21, 1939, P. L. 586, 77 PS §§1201 et seq. The Commonwealth, with the employer and insurance carrier, appealed from the decision of the referee to the board,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Metz v. Quakertown Stove WorksSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
- York v. State Workmen's Insurance FundSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
- Plaugher v. American Viscose Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
- Jones v. Philadelphia & Reading Coal & Iron Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
3Cited by10 opinions
- Fruehauf Corp. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Bingaman v. Baldwin Locomotive Works, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
- Rohner v. Fox ProductsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
- Millcraft Corp. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Updegrove v. Floyd Wells Stove Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.