Legal Opinion

Metz v. Quakertown Stove Works

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 25, 1944No. Appeals, 158 and 159PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Keller, P. J.,

These two claims arose under the Occupational Disease Compensation Act of June 21, 1989, P. L. 566, as amended by Act of June 12, 194-1, P. L. 125, effective on its passage.

The first claim (No. 90,808) was filed by the employee, Morris Metz, on December 17, 1941, and set forth that he became totally disabled on 'September 27, 1941, as a result of silicosis. The second (No. 92,602) was filed by his widow, Annie L. M. Metz, and averred that her husband died on January 10, 1942, as a result of silicosis. The claims were heard together after the employee’s death. The…

2Cited by22 opinions

  1. Fruehauf Corp. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  2. DeMascola v. LancasterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  3. Jaloneck v. Jarecki Manufacturing Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
  4. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp. v. GolmitzCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  5. Witters v. Harrisburg Steel CorporationSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1957

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API