Legal Opinion

Fruehauf Corp. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 28, 1977No. Appeal, No. 1340 C.D. 1976PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Menoer,

Fruehauf Corporation (Fruehauf) appeals from an order of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Board) which affirmed a referee’s award of benefits to Howard W. Cornell. Benefits were awarded for permanent and total disability resulting from an occupational disease as defined in Section 108 (n) of The Pennsylvania Workmen’s Compensation Act1 (Compensation Act).

Cornell, who prior to 1961 had been employed as a coal miner for many years, worked for Fruehauf from July 1961 to July 1974 as an arc welder. In the performance of his duties as a welder, Cornell utilized *343electr…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. UTTER v. Asten-Hill Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  2. Industrial Services Contracting, Inc. v. WilsonCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  3. Metz v. Quakertown Stove WorksSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  4. Scott v. United States Steel Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
  5. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp. v. GolmitzCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1976

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Plasteel Products Corp. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  2. ARMCO, Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  3. Komatsu v. BD. OF TRUSTEES, EMP. RET. SYS.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Lopez v. Board of TrusteesHawaii Supreme Court · 1983
  5. May Department Stores v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API