Bingaman v. Baldwin Locomotive Works, Inc.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Rhodes, J.,
The question for determination on this appeal has been stipulated as follows: Did Dallas M. Bingaman’s employment with defendant satisfy the statutory requirement of “an aggregate employment of at least four years in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, during a period of eight years next preceding the date of disability, in an occupation having a silica or asbestos hazard”?
Dallas M. Bingaman filed a claim petition on September 9, 1940, and set forth therein that he became totally disabled on December 8, 1939, as a result of silicosis while in the course of his employment…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Roschak Et Ux. v. Vulcan Iron WorksSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
- Agostin v. Pittsburgh Steel Foundry Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
- Tokash v. Early Foundry Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
- McGarvey v. Butler Consolidated Coal Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
- Hurtuk v. H. C. Frick Coke Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
3Cited by16 opinions
- Holahan v. Bergen Coal Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
- Porter v. Sterling Supply Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
- Rohner v. Fox ProductsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
- Webster v. Grove City CollegeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
- Crandall v. Downington Iron WorksSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.