Legal Opinion

Rohner v. Fox Products

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 24, 1949No. Appeals, 127 and 129PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Rhodes, P. J.,

These appeals are from the judgment which was entered on an award in favor of the widow of the deceased employe; this is to be paid jointly in stated proportions by defendant employer and its insurance carrier, and by the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.

Defendant employer was engaged in manufacturing lead plates for batteries. Deceased was a lead plater in the employment of defendant. That there was a lead hazard is not in dispute.

The questions presented by these appeals may be stated as follows: (1) Is there competent and substantial evidence in the record sufficient to…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Kline v. KiehlSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
  2. Baumeister v. Baugh & Sons Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  3. Bingaman v. Baldwin Locomotive Works, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
  4. Stauffer v. Hubley Manufacturing Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  5. Williams v. Susquehanna Collieries Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. DeMascola v. LancasterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  2. Rozauski v. Glen Alden Coal Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
  3. Evon v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  4. Muenz v. Kelso Beach Improvement Ass'nSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  5. Brooks v. Gilman Paint CompanyTennessee Supreme Court · 1961

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API