Legal Opinion

Quinton v. General Motors Corp.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 30, 1996No. 100787, Calendar No. 1PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLevin, J.

Following this Court’s decision in Franks v White Pine Copper Div, 422 Mich 636, 649-658; 375 NW2d 715 (1985), the Worker’s Compensation Appeal Board in 1986 ruled, pursuant to Franks, that the weekly benefits owed to plaintiffs’ decedent were subject to coordination pursuant to § 354 of the Worker’s Disability Compensation Act,1 commencing March 31, 1982.

The question presented is whether the doctrine of separation of powers precludes, with respect to workers whose weekly benefits were held to be subject to coordination in, or pursuant to, Franks, application of the 1987 legislation providing…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Lampf, Pleva, Lipkind, Prupis & Petigrow v. GilbertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Plaut v. Spendthrift Farm, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
  3. Chicago & Southern Air Lines, Inc. v. Waterman Steamship Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
  4. James B. Beam Distilling Co. v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. General Motors Corp. v. RomeinSupreme Court of the United States · 1992

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. People v. BunnCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Ex Parte JenkinsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1998
  3. Pierson Sand and Gravel, Inc. v. Keeler Brass Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Kesler v. Barris, Sott, Denn & Driker, PLLCDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2007
  5. Doe v. Department of CorrectionsMichigan Court of Appeals · 2002

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API