Legal Opinion
Cincinnati Insurance Company v. All Plumbing, Inc. Service, Parts, Installation
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided October 18, 2013No. Civil Action No. 2012-0851PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY United States District Judge.
Plaintiff The Cincinnati Insurance Company filed suit against Defendants All Plumbing, Inc. Service, Parts, Installation (“All Plumbing”), Mr. Kabir Shafik (“Shafik”), 1 and FDS Restaurant, Inc., seeking a declaratory judgment that the Plaintiff owes no duty to defend or indemnify All Plumbing and Shafik in connection with a class action lawsuit filed by FDS Restaurants (“FDS”) against All Plumbing and Shafik in the Superior Court for the District of Columbia (“Superior Court”). Presently before the Court are the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Moore v. HartmanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2009
- Geico v. Valentine FetisoffCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1992
- Athridge v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2010
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Wallace v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2014
- Chicago Insurance Company v. Paulson & Nace, PllcDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Cincinnati Insurance Company v. All Plumbing, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2016