Legal Opinion
Cincinnati Insurance Company v. All Plumbing, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided February 5, 2016No. 14-7140, 14-7151PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the Court by Circuit Judge ROGERS.
ROGERS, Circuit Judge:
The Cincinnati Insurance Company (“Cincinnati”) filed a complaint for a declaratory judgment that it owes no duty to defend or indemnify claims brought against its insured, All Plumbing, Inc. and its president (together, “All Plumbing”), for sending unsolicited faxed advertisements alleged to be in violation of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (“TCPA”), 47 U.S.C. § 227. The district court ruled that Cincinnati could not'assert any of its defenses to coverage under the primary liability provision of the policy because it…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Wilton v. Seven Falls Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Catlin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Liberty Mutual Insurance v. WetzelSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Van Cauwenberghe v. BiardSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- United States v. Donald TrumpCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2023
- Scahill v. Dist. of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2017
- Service Employees International Union Local 32BJ v. Preeminent Protective ServiceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2021
- Jewler v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Paracha v. BushDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.