State v. Jones
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
State of Maryland v. Hassan Emmanuel Jones, No. 52, September Term, 2018 CRIMINAL PROCEDURE — SUFFICIENCY OF THE EVIDENCE — ACCOMPLICE CORROBORATION RULE — The accomplice corroboration rule, as it was structured at the time of trial, required evidence independent of accomplice testimony to implicate a defendant in a crime or identify the defendant with the perpetrators of the crime at or near the time it was committed. That evidence was not presented here, and thus the Court of Appeals affirmed the judgment of the Court of Special Appeals overturning the conviction of Respondent as being…
2Cases cited104 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Caminetti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Rogers v. TennesseeSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Carmell v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Owens-Illinois, Inc. v. ZenobiaCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1992
99 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Lipp v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2020
- Kumar v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2021
- State v. SaylesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2024
- Freeman v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2023
- Jordan v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2026
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.