Kumar v. State
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
Amit Kumar v. State of Maryland, No. 21, September Term, 2021 VOIR DIRE – APPLICABILITY OF HOLDING TO PENDING CASES – PRESERVATION FOR APPELLATE REVIEW – Court of Appeals held that holding in Kazadi v. State, 467 Md. 1, 9, 47,
223 A.3d 554, 559, 581
(2020)—that, on request, during voir dire, trial court must ask whether prospective jurors are unwilling or unable to comply with jury instructions on certain fundamental principles and that Kazadi applied to any other cases pending on direct appeal when opinion was filed where relevant question was preserved for appellate review—applies to any case…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Griffith v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- United States v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- MacKey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Sergeant Co. v. PickettCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1979
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. JordanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2022
- Jackson v. State State v. PowellCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2023
- State v. JordanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2022