Freeman v. State
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
Darryl Edward Freeman v. State of Maryland, No. 1118, September Term, 2021. Opinion by Alpert, J. CRIMINAL LAW – EVIDENCE – LAY AND EXPERT OPINION – Officer’s testimony that, based on his experience in the robbery unit, “lick” was slang for “robbery” was expert opinion under Maryland Rule 5-702 and Ragland v. State,
385 Md. 706
(2005), and required that the officer be disclosed prior to trial as an expert. CRIMINAL LAW – EVIDENCE – EXPERT QUALIFICATIONS – Maryland Rule 5-702 requires that a court shall determine: (1) whether the witness is qualified as an expert; (2) the appropriateness of the…
2Cases cited78 opinions
- Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Krulewitch v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- James R. O'COnner v. Commonwealth Edison Company and London Nuclear Services, Inc., and United States of America, Intervenor-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- Beatty v. Trailmaster Products, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
73 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.