Newell v. . Darnell
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtSohenck, J.
Conceding, but not deciding, that the city of Winston-Salem was negligent in allowing the piles of sand to remain upon its sidewalk, the plaintiff specifically alleged and proved several negligent, if not criminal, acts on the part of the defendant Frances Darnell, and we are of the opinion that such negligent acts were the sole and proximate cause of the death of the plaintiff’s intestate, for which the defendant city cannot be held liable. The death of the intestate was not the natural or probable consequence of the city’s alleged negligence in allowing the piles of sand to remain upon the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hinnant v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
- Beach v. . PattonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
- Herman v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
- Balcum v. . JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
- Lineberry Ex Rel. Lineberry v. North Carolina Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Butner v. SpeaseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
- Butner v. . SpeaseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
- Murray v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
- Smith v. . SinkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
- Reeves v. . StaleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.