Legal Opinion

Walters v. Federal Life Insurance

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 6, 1936No. Appeal, 340PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Schaffer,

In this suit brought to recover on a policy of accident insurance the verdict of the jury was for the defendant. The court below granted a new trial and the defendant appealed.

The policy is an unusual one. The premium paid on it was one dollar. The amount of the insurance is $3,000. As might be expected under these circumstances, the right of recovery is strictly limited by the policy’s terms.

The clause to be considered reads thus: “The company will pay for loss of life . . . sustained by the wrecking or disablement of any vehicle or car operated by any private…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Watkins v. Prudential InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  2. Class & Nachod Brewing Co. v. GiacobelloSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
  3. Fornelli v. Penna. R. R. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  4. Philadelphia City Passenger Railway Co. v. HenriceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1880
  5. Welsh v. Erie & Wyoming Valley RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1897

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Carroll v. PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  2. Hodgson v. BigelowSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  3. Frank, Admr. v. BayukSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  4. Fritz v. York Motor Express Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  5. Zuliskey v. Prudential InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1946

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API