Walters v. Federal Life Insurance
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Schaffer,
In this suit brought to recover on a policy of accident insurance the verdict of the jury was for the defendant. The court below granted a new trial and the defendant appealed.
The policy is an unusual one. The premium paid on it was one dollar. The amount of the insurance is $3,000. As might be expected under these circumstances, the right of recovery is strictly limited by the policy’s terms.
The clause to be considered reads thus: “The company will pay for loss of life . . . sustained by the wrecking or disablement of any vehicle or car operated by any private…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Watkins v. Prudential InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
- Class & Nachod Brewing Co. v. GiacobelloSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
- Fornelli v. Penna. R. R. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
- Philadelphia City Passenger Railway Co. v. HenriceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1880
- Welsh v. Erie & Wyoming Valley RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1897
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Carroll v. PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
- Hodgson v. BigelowSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
- Frank, Admr. v. BayukSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
- Fritz v. York Motor Express Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
- Zuliskey v. Prudential InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.