Legal Opinion

Zuliskey v. Prudential Insurance

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 15, 1946No. Appeal, 62PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Arnold, J.,

Defendant appeals from the refusal of the court below to enter judgment n. o. y. upon a verdict for the plaintiff, in this action of assumpsit brought on two insurance policies to recover for the alleged accidental death of Bose Zuliskey, the insured. The amounts sought were payable if “the death . . . occurred as a result, directly and independently of all other causes, of bodily injuries effected solely through external, violent and accidental means. . . .”

The only testimony of the accident was that of one Hall. Bose Zuliskey and Hall had known each other for some ten…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States Mutual Accident Ass'n v. BarrySupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  2. Goater v. KlotzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  3. Muslera v. Patton Clay Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  4. Urian v. Equitable Life Assurance SocietySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  5. Walters v. Federal Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Beckham v. Travelers InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
  2. Cox v. Prudential InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  3. The LIFE & CAS. INS. CO. &C. v. BenionCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1950
  4. Beckham v. Travelers InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  5. Schreck v. Reliance Standard Life InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2000

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API