Slade v. Lee
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Saginaw. (Gage, J;) Assumpsit. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtGrant, J.
Plaintiffs Avere lumber dealers at Columbus, Ohio. The defendant owned a saw-mill in Saginaw, Mich., Avhere he was engaged in the manufacture of lumber. In April, 1887, plaintiff Kelton was at defendant's mill, and, on behalf of his firm, made a contract with defendant for the purchase of some lumber of a certain grade and quality, to be manufactured by the defendant during the folloAvingseason. The lumber Avas manufactured, and piled, according to contract, alongside the railroad track in the defendant’s yard, ready for shipment. Plaintiffs made a partial payment upon the purchase price.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Lingham v. EgglestonMichigan Supreme Court · 1873
- Whitcomb v. WhitneyMichigan Supreme Court · 1872
- Byles v. ColierMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
- Wagar v. FarrinMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
3Cited by5 opinions
- Stewart v. Henningsen Produce Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1913
- H. M. Tyler Lumber Co. v. CharltonMichigan Supreme Court · 1901
- Brunelle v. RuellMichigan Supreme Court · 1905
- Howey v. FisherMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
- Herring Hall Marvin Safe Co. v. EvattUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1945