H. M. Tyler Lumber Co. v. Charlton
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Cheboygan; Shepherd, J. Replevin by the H. M. Tyler Lumber Company against John Charlton, Thomas Charlton, and Justus A. Rogers. From a judgment for plaintiff on verdict directed by the court, defendants bring error.
1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.
This is an action of replevin. There is almost no dispute about the facts. The firm of J. & T. Charlton were the owners of logs which were manufactured into lumber by the Cheboygan Lumber Company in the city of Cheboygan in the spring of 1899. This lumber was piled on thé docks of the Cheboygan Lumber Company. It was known as “Lots 6 and 7 O. K. stock.” Lot 6 was piled in its own piles, separate from lot 7, and separate from all other lumber; and so lot 7 was piled separate from lot 6, and separate from all other lumber. There were scattered among these piles other piles of lumber, but no…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Terry v. . WheelerNew York Court of Appeals · 1862
- Southwestern Freight & Cotton Press Co. v. StanardSupreme Court of Missouri · 1869
- Lingham v. EgglestonMichigan Supreme Court · 1873
- Bates v. ConklíngNew York Supreme Court · 1833
- Olyphant v. BakerNew York Supreme Court · 1848
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Germain v. LoudMichigan Supreme Court · 1915
- Richardson Lumber Co. v. HoeyMichigan Supreme Court · 1922
- Smiley v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1914
- Carver v. ShermanMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
- Gow v. McFarrenMichigan Supreme Court · 1909
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.