Legal Opinion

Wagar v. Farrin

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 11, 1888PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error to Oceana. (Bussell, J.) Assumpsit. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, J.

Plaintiff sued the defendant for the breach of a lumber contract .in not accepting and paying for lumber sawed. Dpon the trial the testimony and issues presented by the plaintiff took a wide range, and *371the record is accordingly quite large. But tho assignments of error, though numerous, are confined on the argument to a narrow controversy, and the case need not be detailed at length.

On August 15, 1882, plaintiff, by written contract, made an agreement to sell 6,000,000 feet of pine, that should cut in specified grades, at specified prices. These were three grades of clear uppers, at $34 a…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. H. M. Tyler Lumber Co. v. CharltonMichigan Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Slade v. LeeMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Gow v. McFarrenMichigan Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Grand Rapids Bark & Lumber Co. v. Township of InlandMichigan Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Herring Hall Marvin Safe Co. v. EvattUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API