Legal Opinion
Cannata v. Department of Environmental Protection
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided August 20, 1996No. 15371PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPalmer, J.
The plaintiffs, Deborah and Michael Cannata, appeal from the judgment of the trial court dismissing their administrative appeal from the decision of the named defendant,1 the department of environmental protection (department), in which the commissioner of environmental protection (commissioner) had rejected their application for authorization under General Stat*126utes §§ 22a-342 and 22a-3492 to clear-cut3 approximately fifty-five acres of their property in Cromwell. The plaintiffs sought permission from the commissioner to cut down the trees on the property, which is located within the stream…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- State v. HintonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Griffin Hospital v. Commission on Hospitals & Health CareSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- Wilson v. Freedom of Information CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- City of New Haven v. Freedom of Information CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Figueroa v. C & S Ball BearingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Chotkowski v. StateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- MacDermid, Inc. v. Department of Environmental ProtectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- Sweetman v. State Elections Enforcement CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- New England Cable Television Ass'n v. Department of Public Utility ControlSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- Corcoran v. Department of Social ServicesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.