Legal Opinion

United States of America, Cross-Appellant v. Marsden W. Miller, Jr., and William C. Huls, Cross-Appellees

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided January 23, 1992No. 90-3512PublishedCited by 83 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GARWOOD, Circuit Judge:

Following the reversal by this Court of the mail fraud convictions of defendants-appellants Marsden W. Miller, Jr. (Miller) and William C. Huls (Huls) because the indictment and the jury instructions permitted the jury to convict without finding the deprivation of a property right, the government brought a new indictment. In this pretrial appeal, both Miller and Huls appeal from the district court’s order denying their motions to dismiss the indictment on double jeopardy and collateral estoppel grounds. The government cross-appeals from the district court’s collateral…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Abney v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. United States v. ScottSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Grady v. CorbinSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. United States v. Martin Linen Supply Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by83 opinions

  1. State v. RieweCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
  2. United States v. Steven Eugene Smith, Randy Ray SmithCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
  3. Hoffler v. BezioCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013
  4. United States v. Richard Eugene MillerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998
  5. Eric Scott Patterson v. Thomas B. Haskins, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006

78 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API