Hanson v. Salt Lake City
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
WADE, Justice.
Plaintiff, Orson Hanson, respondent here, brought this action against defendant, Salt Lake City, appellant here, for injunctive relief and money damages. He claims that as a result of the city drilling a large well and pumping large quantities of water therefrom during the summer of 1934 in the neighborhood of his artesian well, the flow of water therefrom was greatly reduced so that without the aid of a pump on his well it would not supply sufficient water to satisfy his culinary and irrigation requirements as it had previously done, and that to supply his needs he installed a…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Big Cottonwood Tanner Ditch Co. v. MoyleUtah Supreme Court · 1946
- City of Lodi v. East Bay Municipal Utility DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Crescent Mining Co. v. Silver King Mining Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1898
- Horne v. Utah Oil Refining Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1921
- Willow Creek Irrigation Co. v. MichaelsonUtah Supreme Court · 1900
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- McNaughton v. EatonUtah Supreme Court · 1952
- F. Arthur Stone & Sons v. GibsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1981
- Salt Lake City v. Silver Fork Pipeline Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 2000
- Hardy Salt Co. v. Southern Pacific Transportation Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1974
- Little Cottonwood Water Co. v. Sandy CityUtah Supreme Court · 1953
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.