Little Cottonwood Water Co. v. Sandy City
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
WADE, Justice.
An appeal from the decision of the State Engineer and the District Court approving the joint application of Sandy and Midvale cities to appropriate 1 cubic foot per second of underground water. Respondents propose to pump water from two wells near the mouth of Little Cottonwood Can yon and thereby increase the water available for use from the surface flow of Little Cottonwood Creek which increase they propose to appropriate for domestic use. The appellants, Salt Lake City and Little Cottonwood Water Company claim that the evidence conclusively shows that such pumping merely…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Sullivan v. Northern Spy Mining Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1895
- United States v. District Court of Fourth Judicial Dist. Ex Rel. Utah CountyUtah Supreme Court · 1951
- Wrathall v. JohnsonUtah Supreme Court · 1935
- Little Cottonwood Water Co. v. KimballUtah Supreme Court · 1930
- Whitmore v. Murray CityUtah Supreme Court · 1944
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Templeton v. Pecos Valley Artesian Conservancy DistrictNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1958
- Salt Lake City v. Silver Fork Pipeline Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 2000
- Piute Reservoir & Irrigation Co. v. West Panguitch Irrigation & Reservoir Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1962
- Salmon River Canal Co., Ltd. v. Bell Brand Ranches, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- Salmon River Canal Co. v. Bell Brand Ranches, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.