Salt Lake City v. Silver Fork Pipeline Corp.
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
STEWART, Justice:
1 1 Silver Fork Pipeline Corporation (hereinafter "SFPC") appeals the trial court's decision to quiet title in Salt Lake City to nearly .5 cubic feet per second ("ef.s.") of water flowing in Big Cottonwood Creek (the "creek") that SFPC had been diverting at the Kentucky-Utah Mine (the "mine". SFPC also appeals the court's dismissal of its counterclaim seeking reimbursement of amounts it paid Salt Lake to purchase water from the mine. We affirm.
I. THE MORSE DECREE ADJUDICATION OF BIG COTTONWOOD CREEK
112 Big Cottonwood Canyon lies southeast of Salt Lake City. Big Cottonwood…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Crescent Mining Co. v. Silver King Mining Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1898
- Sullivan v. Northern Spy Mining Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1895
- Wrathall v. JohnsonUtah Supreme Court · 1935
- Home Owners' Loan Corporation v. DudleyUtah Supreme Court · 1943
- Wellsville East Field Irr. Co. v. Lindsay Land & Livestock Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1943
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Orvis v. JohnsonUtah Supreme Court · 2008
- Bingham v. Roosevelt City Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 2010
- Butler, Crockett & Walsh Development Corp. v. Pinecrest Pipeline Operating Co.Utah Supreme Court · 2004
- Thatcher v. LangCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2020
- Haynes Land & Livestock Co. v. Jacob Family Chalk Creek, LLCCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2010
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.