Griswold v. City of Homer
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
*1281OPINION
CARPENETI, Justice.
I,. INTRODUCTION
Frank S. Griswold challenges a city ordinance permitting automobile-related uses in Homer's central business district. Griswold alleges that the ordinance amounts to spot zoning, that proper procedures were not followed in passing the ordinance, and that disqualifying conflicts of interest exist,. The superior court dismissed all of Griswold's claims on summary judgment. Because Griswold has failed to establish a material difference between this case and our decision in Griswold v. City of Homer (Griswold I),1 we hold that Griswold I is controlling…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Concerned Citizens of South Kenai Peninsula v. Kenai Peninsula BoroughAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
- Baxley v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1998
- Westland West Community Ass'n v. Knox CountyTennessee Supreme Court · 1997
- Liberati v. Bristol Bay BoroughAlaska Supreme Court · 1978
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Midgett v. Cook Inlet Pre-Trial FacilityAlaska Supreme Court · 2002
- Griswold v. City of HomerAlaska Supreme Court · 2011
- Becker v. Falls Road Comm. Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2022
- Griswold v. Homer Bd. of AdjustmentAlaska Supreme Court · 2019
- Becker v. Falls Road Comm. Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2022
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.