Legal Opinion

Midgett v. Cook Inlet Pre-Trial Facility

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided August 30, 2002No. S-9948PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CARPENETI, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

While awaiting sentencing as a federal prisoner at Cook Inlet Pretrial Facility, Abraham L. Midgett, III got into a fight with another inmate. During the melee, Midgett broke his ankle. He sued the state in federal court on various theories. After failing to gain relief there, Midgett filed suit in superi- or court alleging negligence, violations of his constitutional rights, breach of contract, and medical malpractice. The superior court ruled that Midgett's constitutional claims were barred by collateral estoppel, granted summary judgment to the…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Clary Insurance Agency v. DoyleAlaska Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Otton v. ZaboracAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Balough v. Fairbanks North Star BoroughAlaska Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Flores v. FloresAlaska Supreme Court · 1979

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Richardson v. Municipality of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Ranes & Shine, LLC v. MacDonald Miller Alaska, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2015
  3. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. State, Department of Environmental ConservationAlaska Supreme Court · 2006
  4. In Re the Necessity for the Hospitalization of Jacob S.Alaska Supreme Court · 2016
  5. Willoya v. State, Department of CorrectionsAlaska Supreme Court · 2002

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API