Legal Opinion

Griswold v. Homer Bd. of Adjustment

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided April 19, 2019No. Supreme Court No. S-16267PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CARNEY, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

Frank Griswold appealed a decision of the Homer Advisory Planning Commission to the Homer Board of Adjustment. The Board rejected his appeal for lack of standing. Griswold *250appealed to the superior court, arguing that he had standing under the Homer City Code and alleging a number of due process violations. The superior court ruled that Griswold lacked standing as a matter of law and found any due process errors harmless. It also awarded the Board attorney's fees on the appeal, reasoning that Griswold did not qualify for protection from attorney's fees as a…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Massachusetts v. Environmental Protection AgencySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Trustees for Alaska v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Fairbanks Fire Fighters Ass'n, Local 1324 v. City of FairbanksAlaska Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Heller v. State, Department of RevenueAlaska Supreme Court · 2013
  5. Kleven v. Yukon-Koyukuk School DistrictAlaska Supreme Court · 1993

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. PLC, LLC. and MH2, LLC. v. State of Alaska, Department of Natural ResourcesAlaska Supreme Court · 2021
  2. Mate Valoaga v. State of Alaska, Department of CorrectionsAlaska Supreme Court · 2025
  3. Winco Anchorage Investors I, LP v. Huffman Building P, LLC and Municipality of Anchorage, Zoning Board of Examiners and AppealsAlaska Supreme Court · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API