Legal Opinion
In re O'Keefe
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Decided July 2, 2004No. 2003-B-3195PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS
|, PER CURIAM.
This disciplinary matter arises from formal charges filed by the Office of Disciplinary Counsel (“ODC”) against respondent, Michael H. O’Keefe, an attorney licensed to practice law in Louisiana but currently on interim suspension.1
PRIOR DISCIPLINARY HISTORY
Before we examine the current disciplinary charges, we find it helpful to review respondent’s prior disciplinary history.
Respondent was admitted to the practice of law in Louisiana in 1955. In 1983, respondent was convicted in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- In Re RuffaloSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. WhittingtonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1984
- In Re CaulfieldSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1996
- In Re PardueSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1994
- In Re QuaidSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1994
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- In re MuhammadSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2009
- In re StephensSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2007
- In re Universal Building ProductsUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · 2010
- In re BurksSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2007
- In Re DillonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2011
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.