Legal Opinion
In Re Pardue
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Decided March 11, 1994No. 93-B-2865PublishedCited by 331 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
633 So.2d 150 (1994)
In re Hobart O. PARDUE.
No. 93-B-2865.
Supreme Court of Louisiana.
March 11, 1994.
T. Haller Jackson, III, Shreveport, G. Fred Ours, John T. Seale, New Orleans, for applicant.
Hobart O. Pardue, Basile J. Uddo, New Orleans, for respondent.
DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS
PER CURIAM[*].
The formal charges alleged (1) that respondent, Hobart O. Pardue, permitted a client's tort claim to prescribe by failing to achieve timely filing of the petition; (2) that he concealed this fact from the client; and (3) that upon her discovery of the dismissal he offered to settle her malpractice claim…
2Cited by331 opinions
- In Re CaulfieldSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1996
- In Re BanksSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2009
- In Re AustinSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2006
- In re HardySupreme Court of Louisiana · 2003
- In re O'KeefeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2004
326 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.