Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

In re Muhammad

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided March 4, 2009No. 2008-B-2769PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*459ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS

2Per curiam

11 This disciplinary matter arises from formal charges filed by the Office of Disciplinary Counsel (“ODC”) against respondent, Ahmad Muhammad, an attorney licensed to practice law in Louisiana but currently on interim suspension based upon his conviction of a serious crime. In re: Muhammad, 04-1643 (La.7/9/04), 878 So.2d 515.

PRIOR DISCIPLINARY HISTORY

Before we address the current charges, we find it helpful to review respondent’s prior disciplinary history. Respondent was admitted to the practice of law in Louisiana in 1984. In October 1990, respondent…

3Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. WilkinsonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1990
  2. Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. PerezSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1989
  3. In re BoudreauSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2002
  4. Louisiana State Bar Association v. HaylonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1967
  5. In re MorphisSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2002

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by7 opinions

  1. In re MitchellSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2014
  2. In Re BoyerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2010
  3. In Re JudiceSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2010
  4. In Re: Ashton R. O'DwyerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2017
  5. In re AlfortishSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2014

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API