Legal Opinion · Dissent

Barnes v. Weyerhaeuser Co.

North Carolina Industrial Commission

Decided August 18, 2003No. I.C. NO. 922834Published

1Dissent

I disagree with the majority's conclusion that plaintiff has asbestosis and that he is entitled to 104 weeks of benefits pursuant to §97-61.5(b). The prerequisites for an order of removal under §97-61.5(b) are:

Diagnosis of asbestosis or silicosis; and

Current employment that exposes plaintiff to the hazards of asbestosis or silicosis.

N.C. Gen. Stat. § 97-61.5(b); see Austin v. Continental GeneralTire, 141 N.C. App. 397, 540 S.E.2d 824 (2000) (J. Greene, dissenting),reversed and adopting dissenting opinion, 354 N.C. 344, 553 S.E.2d 680 (2001); Abernathy v. Sandoz Chemicals, 151 N.C. App. 252,…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Rutledge v. Tultex Corp./Kings YarnSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  3. Young v. Hickory Business FurnitureSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2000
  4. Barber v. Babcock & Wilcox Construction Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991
  5. Young v. . Whitehall Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1948

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API