Barrett v. Harman
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
The above action was brought by plaintiff, a minor, to recover damages for physical injuries alleged to have been caused by the negligent operation of an automobile by defendant Eva Harman. The complaint alleged also that the automobile was owned by defendant corporation and was being operated by its permission. Defendants denied the allegations of negligence, and averred that plaintiff’s negligence proximately contributed to his injuries. The jury returned a verdict against both defendants in the sum of $3,500, and from the judgment entered thereon they have appealed.
As grounds for…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Smellie v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1931
- Zibbell v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1911
- Hatzakorzian v. Rucker-Fuller Desk Co.California Supreme Court · 1925
- Heron v. RileyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
- Cahill v. E. B. & A. L. Stone Co.California Supreme Court · 1914
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Hughes v. QuackenbushCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
- Law v. GallegherSupreme Court of Delaware · 1938
- Mecchi v. Lyon Van & Storage Co.California Court of Appeal · 1940
- Scalf v. EicherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
- Woodman v. Hemet Union High School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.