Legal Opinion

Woodman v. Hemet Union High School District

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 1, 1934No. Docket No. 1440PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarks, J.

This action was instituted by Donald Woodman, a minor, by his guardian ad litem, and by Rena Woodman, his mother, to recover damages sustained by them because of injuries to Donald resulting from the alleged negligence of all of the defendants. A verdict was returned and judgment rendered in favor of the Riverside County Council of Boy Scouts of America and the Troop Committee of Hemet Troop No. 47; and in favor of plaintiffs and against appellants in the sum of $2,500 for the injuries suffered by Donald, and $1113.30 for expenses of his mother in his care and medical treatment.

For brevity we…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Smellie v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Commonwealth v. PierceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1884
  3. Hatzakorzian v. Rucker-Fuller Desk Co.California Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Crawford v. FosterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  5. Beeson v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. McCann v. HoffmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Whitechat v. GuyetteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Mecchi v. Lyon Van & Storage Co.California Court of Appeal · 1940
  4. Demmer v. City of EurekaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  5. Ziegler v. Santa Cruz City High School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API