Legal Opinion
Wittenbach v. Ryan
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 12, 1976No. Civ. 15886PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KAUFMAN, J.
In this personal injury action, the jury, on the basis of comparative negligence, returned a verdict in favor of plaintiff in the amount of $3,250. Judgment was entered accordingly. Plaintiff’s motion for new trial was denied. Plaintiff appeals from the judgment contending that there is no evidence of any negligence on the part of plaintiff, that it was, therefore, error to instruct on comparative negligence, and that the award of $3,250 was grossly inadequate as a matter of law. We have concluded that plaintiff’s contentions are not meritorious. Accordingly, we affirm the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Crawford v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1935
- Nga Li v. Yellow Cab Co.California Supreme Court · 1975
- Gray v. BrinkerhoffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- Merlo v. Standard Life & Accident InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- Myers v. KingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Northwestern Mut. Ins. Co. v. Farmers Ins. GroupCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
- Ramona Manor Convalescent Hospital v. Care EnterprisesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- People Ex Rel. Department of Public Works v. Peninsula Enterprises, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1979
- People v. Rath Packing Co.California Court of Appeal · 1978
- Bradfield v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1979
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.