Legal Opinion
Samish Indian Nation v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided May 27, 2008No. 02-1383 LPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
SWEENEY, Judge.
Plaintiff in the above-captioned case is a federally recognized Indian tribe that seeks compensation for the benefits it would have received between 1969 and 1996, if it had been properly recognized by the federal government during that time period. The government, in its motion to dismiss, contends that this court lacks jurisdiction over plaintiffs second amended complaint. Due to a discovery dispute, only limited issues from defendant’s motion to dismiss are presently before the court. These issues concern the following general question: do the networks of…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
- McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. SherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Samish Indian Nation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
- Rosales v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
- Refaei v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
- Samish Indian Nation v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
- Semper v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.