Legal Opinion
Rosales v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided October 7, 2009No. Nos. 08-512 L, 98-860 LPublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
BLOCK, Judge.
Two cases before this court, Walter J. Rosales and Karen Toggery v. United States, No. 08-512 L. (“Rosales X”), and Walter Rosales, et al. v. United States, No. 98-860 L. (“Rosales VI ”), arise out of a common set of facts and implicate similar principles of law. For the purposes of judicial economy, the court addresses both cases in this single opinion.
Both cases stem from internecine disputes among the members and purported members of the Jamul Indian Village (“Village”), a federally-recognized tribal government.1 The two complaints before this court, in…
2Cases cited48 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Montana v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Klamath Tribe Claims Committee v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
- Petro-Hunt, L.L.C. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
- Jamul Action Committee v. E. Sequoyah SimermeyerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- Begay v. Public Service Co. of NMDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2010
- Wolfchild v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.