Legal Opinion
Samish Indian Nation v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided November 30, 2009No. 02-1383LPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
SWEENEY, Judge.
Plaintiff in the instant action is a federally recognized Indian tribe that seeks compensation for the programs, services, and benefits that it claims it would have received between 1969 and 1996, if it had been properly recognized by the federal government during that time period. The court previously ruled that it lacked jurisdiction to entertain those portions of plaintiffs second amended complaint specifically implicating the Tribal Priority Allocation (“TPA”) system and the Indian Health Service (“IHS”) funding process. In its renewed motion to dismiss,…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Samish Indian Nation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
- Lummi Tribe of the Lummi Reservation v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
- Wolfchild v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
- Yakama Nation Housing Authority v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
- Finch v. City of IndianapolisDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2012
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.